data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9b95/f9b95aab47289802e975aa26e463b85deba9bd3b" alt=""
I am playing with cameras since I was a teenager. My first real camera after the Kodak Instamatic with the ultra modern flash cubes was the RICOH TLS 401. Why a RICOH?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/855cf/855cfad8e0215c651fc470aba20a585f86eae792" alt=""
She was the only cheap SLR camera who had 2 viewfinders. One as usual and one on top. You see now where my fable for cameras with more viewfinder / display felxibility comes from.
With the RICOH I went through all the fun the people today have who buy a DSLR. First the camera, then you add some more lenses for flexibility, you need a flash (hello Olympus E-P1), there is need for a tripod and definitely some filters, lens hood, remote (was a rubber squeeze ball with a hose to remotely trigger the shutter. I had my first girlfriend and - well you can guess) . Put this all in a nice bag - nah the tripod is too big you need to carry it extra, and you have yourself a semi professional setup. Somebody just forgot to tell you about the fun and convenience to schlepp it around with you permanently - you don´t want to miss that shot, don´t you?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62527/62527c0bbb6976eab6602440776186b146550d93" alt=""
A cheap bastard I already was as a teenager and a fan of the big picture also. So instead of making pictures, I was making slides and discovered the easy way of foto manipulation by just putting 2 slides together in one frame to create something rather unique.
Please remember that was many years before the IBM PC was born and the normal picture manipulation was done in a darkroom or via (air) brush.
After my experience with the camera equipment and the unwillingness to always carry it around, I was happy when the superzooms came into play. The usual 3x zoom was a bit limited and so was the creativity what you could do with it.
I was wondering if the panorama mode would work under these low light conditions.
Here is the cropped, resized and re compressed result. It was shot with ISO 800 and 1/30 sec.
We are talking of a camera movement in a 180 degree circle with all the shake, rattle and roll you get when you do this in a spur of the moment where in time you got the tripod ready the colors were gone. Did it come out perfect?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/195da/195da5f92b19c6e37168b78518533fac4a9034f4" alt=""
No, there were some stitching errors. Is that bad? No, I just cut out what I wanted and if it was important to me I could have easily fixed the the crocked phone line.
To have a camera who delivers these low light shots is simply amazing.
Isn´t the ISO 800 noise really bad in a moved around blurred picture?
Not for me when I consider under what circumstances this shot was taken, no Sir, not bad at all.
For your critical eye here a lossless crop of the original, unchanged in any way.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42c8a/42c8a9e6b62ef44973b8ec08b0786eca2ed5471d" alt=""
Update 2009.8.20
It is extremely hard to catch a permanent fast moving flying bug (sorry have no idea how it is named) in macro mode. So, the bug moves, the camera moves the distance to the bug moves - you get the idea. So you need a camera who is very quick in focus and shooting. And lots of pictures to get at least a few clear ones. 100% lossless crop.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60c95/60c957fc190ac067ba148409afb6e1c5038ddbab" alt=""
The 20x zoom combined with the forced flash to get the detail what is lurking in the bushes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db942/db942f1eaf3ebc52661c598506b52cb2201f5d21" alt=""
Perfect flash exposure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb07d/fb07dac223c150c2754aa7c7562928dc0977a545" alt=""
... to be continued
What the f*ck man !!! It's amazing !!! I'm going to buy ont soon! The Marco image is great, I love it :X
ReplyDeleteThanks!